« Klosterman on Snakes | Main | Sunday Afternoon Links »

July 15, 2006

Cable TV and Me

For now, a quick pointer to Steven Johnson on The Daily Show (thanks to JBJ at The Salt-Box), promoting Everything Bad is Good For You, in which he argues that TV and video games are actually making us smarter. I briefly discussed Johnson's book a few months ago when I was reflecting on my own television-watching habits and have been revisiting some of his ideas recently because I have cable television for the first time since the spring of 1998. I don't want to rehash those arguments here, and it would be unwise to generalize about cable television from the very limited sample of cable programs I've watched since installing cable (itself a concession to living in a smaller city with fewer art house screens), although cable news has been as bad or worse than I'd been led to believe.

That being said, it's difficult for me not to feel somewhat overwhelmed by the sheer number of channels and television shows available at any given time, with the result that I often feel like I should be watching something else or at least watching two or three shows at once, which probably means I'll be getting TiVo soon. I've been trying to pay careful attention to how regular access to cable television changes my TV watching habits because even though I have cable and sometimes face the difficulty of choosing between 2 or 3 shows at a given time, I don't think I've been watching more television and I remain virtually incapable of watching TV without also doing something else (cooking, eating, reading, blog surfing, even exercising). But I'll still be curious to see how I learn to incorporate cable TV into the habits and practices of my daily life. More on this topic later, but I initially planned this entry as a quick link to the Johnson interview and his recent blog entry on Raymond Williams.

Posted by chuck at July 15, 2006 12:32 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.wordherders.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.fpl/5763

Comments

I actually read that book back in December, and I always get excited and feel smart when it's brought up. As a television addict, this book makes me really happy. Although naturally, the book has its issues. As good as television is today, there are some things you just can't learn by watching Lost. Except what lottery numbers not to play.

Which shows are you looking at?

Posted by: Taylor at July 15, 2006 6:18 PM

Funny, I thought about teaching sections of Bad in one of my media studies courses (senior seminar, IIRC) but didn't because it wasn't critical enough.

I haven't been watching anything terribly groundbreaking, but it's nice to have regular access to The Daily Show, Colbert, IFC, and the Sundance Channel. I'm enjoying Entourage and have been trying to get into Big Love (so far, I like the actors much better than the show itself), especially since HBO has been running it non-stop. Based on all the good buzz, I'm also going to try to get caught up on Deadwood, too. Do you have any show suggestions?

Posted by: Chuck at July 15, 2006 7:31 PM

I really liked the book, but I dunno how to teach it for longer than a day. That's why I'm not the teacher, I guess.

Well, most of mine are network and readily available anyway. My network favs are Lost, Desperate Housewives (so trashy and enjoyable!), 24, Family Guy, Scrubs, and House. For cable? Not as much, actually. South Park, Doctor Who (yay for Tenth Doctor downloads!!), The Boondocks. And I surf the rest, or won't admit to them. I started watching Big Love, but I couldn't get into it. Dead Like Me was good.

I also highly reccommend Arrested Development, although you've probably seen it, and it's cancelled now anyway.

Posted by: Taylor at July 15, 2006 11:29 PM

TiVo or some other DVR is essential these days - you will always have something interesting to watch...
Do you have IFC and Sundance channels? They are fantastic. And HBO has some amazing series, like Rome and Big Love.
Actually, I have every channel and am not ashamed. Hey, I'm a single guy and it keeps me out of trouble. And movies are my passion. I still go to the movies a couple times a month, too, though.

Posted by: Chris at July 16, 2006 10:25 AM

Taylor, I probably would have taught the book for only one class period (and I wouldn't have required reading the whole thing). At the time I was interested (if not entirely convinced by) in his argument that television narratives are becoming more complicated. I've been wanting to watch The Boondocks for a while; maybe I'll try to catch a few episodes later this summer.

Chris, I do have IFC and Sunance, and both channels are highly addictive. When I lived in DC, I'd see at least five movies a month, but there simply aren't enough movies playing in my new location to get me out to the theater that often. I'm still thining about getting a DVR; after all, most shows on cable eventually play again (and again and again), but I'm more curious to see how I would use a DVR.

I'm also single and find that cable, DVDs, and movies are a nice distraction (today, oddly enough, it was a "state" marathon with Garden State and Sunshine State).

Posted by: Chuck at July 16, 2006 6:01 PM

If you are interested, there is a website dedicated to refuting Mr. Johnson's argument.

www.tvSmarter.com

Posted by: Terry [TypeKey Profile Page] at July 20, 2006 5:36 AM

Thanks for the pointer, Terry. As my comments imply, I'm not entirely convinced by Johnson's argument, but I've been intrigued by teh discussion it raises.

Posted by: Chuck at July 20, 2006 11:52 AM

Post a comment




Remember Me?

(you may use HTML tags for style)